11/04/2012
Four nightmare election scenarios for what could go wrong
In Florida, voters cried out in frustration as polling stations became overwhelmed, and the Democratic Party had sued to extend early voting after some people were stuck on lines for hours trying to meet Saturday's deadline. NBC's Michael Isikoff reports. By Michael Isikoff, NBC News With more than 90 million Americans expected to cast their ballots on Tuesday, election officials across the country are bracing for what some fear will be a "perfect storm" of election day problems that could result in tense confrontations at polling stations and a rush to the courthouse to file legal challenges. The list of actual and potential problems is unusually long this year, ranging from concerns about machine failures to confusion over new rules governing voter ID and provisional ballots. Another big wild card: the impact of groups such as "True the Vote," a Tea Party off-shoot, that is vowing to swarm polling places with an army of hundreds of thousands of "citizen" poll watchers to look for fraud and challenge ineligible voters. It's a threat that civil rights groups are vowing to fight with their own rival armies of poll watchers -- to "monitor the monitors," says one activist. "Our election system has probably never been under as much strain as it is right now -- anything that can go wrong, probably will go wrong," said Victoria Bassetti, a former Senate Judiciary Committee counsel and the author of the new book, "Electoral Dysfunction: A Survival Manual for American Voters." Bassetti notes that the camps backing both President Barack Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney have "pre-positioned their legal assets" by deploying thousands of volunteer lawyers to battleground states in order to challenge decisions by election supervisors, in court if necessary. In Florida, the litigation is already heating up. On Sunday, the Florida Democratic Party filed emergency lawsuits to extend early voting -- challenging GOP governor Rick Scott's refusal to do so -- after some voters were stuck in lines for up to six hours trying to meet Saturday's deadline for early ballots. When the Miami Dade election office reopened to allow in-person absentee balloting, and then temporarily shut it down, frustrated voters started shouting, "Let Us Vote! Let Us Vote!"-- stirred up by a man wearing an Obama campaign tee shirt. It could be a preview of what happens Tuesday. "We can expect lots of yelling and screaming- and lawsuits," said Bassetti. The upshot is that, if the voting is as close as some (but not all) polls suggest, the winner of the presidential election may not be known for days, if not weeks, after Election Day. "We're going to be in sudden death overtime," predicts John Fund, a former Wall Street Journal editorial writer and the co-author of "Who's Counting: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk." To be sure, disputes about voting are hardly new -- and some of the potential problems most frequently cited by advocates on both sides of the political fence could prove to be overblown. But experts interviewed by NBC News identified a number of so-called "nightmare scenarios" that could complicate the counting of returns on Tuesday. Here's a look at four of those scenarios: 1) The national vote count for president is thrown into doubt because of the impact of Hurricane Sandy. The devastation wrought by Hurricane Sandy in the Northeast appears likely to hold down vote totals in the region. In New Jersey, hundreds of polling stations may be without power -- late last week nearly half of the 240 locations in Hudson County were out of commission and officials are scrambling to find alternatives. On Saturday, Gov. Chris Christie's administration announced that it will allow voters to download ballots off a state Website and return them by e-mail -- a system that some experts have warned could lead to tampering by hackers. (A voting group called the Verified Voting Foundation has repeatedly warned about the security risks from Internet voting.) On Thursday, the state's lieutenant governor, Kim Guardagno, said the state will deploy Defense Department trucks with "Vote Here" signs, protected by National Guard members. But that plan prompted concerns among some Democrats that military trucks could intimidate voters, especially in minority neighborhoods, and there were signs over the weekend that officials may be backing away from it. "Obviously, this is uncharted water for us -- getting hit with this at this late date just before a huge election," said Michael Harper, the clerk of elections in New Jersey's Hudson County, during a tour of damaged and flooded polling stations on Saturday. While the hardest hit states like New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut are all considered reliably Democratic and safely in the Obama column, the aftermath of the hurricane could affect the president's total national vote counts -- and raise questions about his mandate or even legitimacy if he loses the popular vote but wins the Electoral College (just as some Democrats questioned President George W. Bush's legitimacy after he lost the popular vote in 2000.) 2) A large number of provisional ballots makes the Electoral College winner impossible to determine on election night. The situation appears most acute in Ohio, a crucial battleground, where some experts have warned about a counting disaster stemming from what are expected to be as many as 200,000 provisional ballots. The background: in an effort to impose uniformity, GOP Secretary of State Jon Husted over the summer directed that absentee ballot applications be mailed out to all of the state's 6.9 million registered voters -- regardless of whether they had asked for them or not. About 1.3 million voters filled out those applications and received absentee ballots in the mail. But as of this weekend, 238,678 voters who got absentee ballots had not returned them. If those voters don't return their ballots by mail by tomorrow and try to go to the polls on Tuesday instead, they along with others whose eligibility could be questioned or who show up at the wrong polling station, will have to cast provisional ballots to make sure they haven't vote twice. And under Ohio law, those ballots can't even be counted until Nov. 16, ten days after Election Day. "There's a realistic chance that we will not know which candidate won the presidential election in Ohio because of the existence of provisional ballots, that we will be in overtime," said Edward Foley, an election law expert and professor of law at Ohio State University. The issue intensified on Friday when Husted issued a new directive that puts the burden on voters, rather than poll workers, to properly fill out a form recording what ID was presented for provisional ballots -- and instructing election boards to throw out provisional ballots if the forms are incomplete or contain any mistakes. The directive has triggered a last minute law suit by voting rights groups, increasing the likelihood of disputes over the counting of provisional ballots in a pivotal battleground state. 3) Disputes over ballot printing errors, machine errors, and a lack of paper trail could bog down the counting in other battleground states. This problem has already arisen in Florida. About 27,000 absentee ballots in Palm Beach County, Florida -- famous for its "butterfly" ballots and hanging chads during the 2000 Florida recount -- can't be read by voting machines because of a printing error. This forced election officials last week to begin the arduous process of hand-copying those ballots in order to feed them into the machines -- while lawyers from both sides looked on, raising challenges. An exasperated Susan Bucher, the country's election supervisor, was caught on camera admonishing lawyers over what she termed "frivolous" objections and threatening to eject them. But questions about machine failures are far broader than that. Last week, lawyers for the Republican National Committee wrote letters to attorneys general in six states asking for investigations after receiving reports that some voters had complained that machines had recorded their votes for Mitt Romney as being for Obama. Two voting experts warned on Saturday "we risk catastrophe" if recounts are required in Virginia and Pennsylvania "because most of their votes will be cast on paperless voting machines that are impossible to recount." 4) Legions of citizen poll watchers on both sides create confusion and even chaos at some polling stations. "True the Vote," the Texas-based Tea Party inspired group, has launched an aggressive national effort to root out vote fraud, providing training videos and computer software (that contain data on property records and death indexes) to help volunteers identify ineligible voters who show up at the polls on Tuesday. Hans Von Spakovsky, a former Federal Election Commissioner who serves as one of the group's advisers, defends the effort, telling NBC News that in a close election "any bogus vote" needs to be stopped. "Anytime you have a close election, a small amount of fraud could make the difference." But voting rights groups say "True the Vote" and its affiliates threaten to intimidate legitimate voters -- a prospect they aim to combat with their own battalions of citizen poll watchers on Tuesday. Judith Browne Dianas, co-director of the "Advancement Project," a civil rights group, says her organization has lined up thousands of lawyers and poll watchers in 20 key states to look for "suspicious activity" by True the Vote and its affiliates. "We will also be watching the poll watchers making sure they aren't acting as bullies," she says. |
In mad dash, candidates seek every vote
Mitt Romney, striking a hopeful tone in the final days of the 2012 race, returned to Iowa, the state that launched his campaign. By Tom Curry, NBC News national affairs writer With the hours quickly running out before voters render their verdict, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney reached out Sunday for the votes of independents who may be disenchanted with President Barack Obama, telling a crowd in Cleveland, "He promised to do so very much, but frankly he fell so very short. He promised to be a post-partisan president, but he's been most partisan, he's been divisive, blaming, attacking, dividing. And by the way, it's not only Republicans that he refused to listen too, he also refused to listen to independent voices." Later in his speech Romney added another pitch to the independents in Ohio: "Now so many of you look at the big debates in this country, and you don't look at them as a Republican or as a Democrat, but first as an American…. You hoped that President Obama would live up to his promise to bring people together to solve big problems, but he hasn't. And I will." After campaigning with former president Bill Clinton in New Hampshire Sunday morning, Obama touched down in Florida Sunday afternoon, and was then headed to Ohio in the evening and will arrive in Colorado in the middle of the night. As he has for several stops in the last two days, Romney alluded at his Cleveland event to Obama's comment on Friday that "voting's the best revenge," by saying, "In his closing argument, President Obama asked his supporters to vote for revenge. For revenge. Instead, I ask the American people to vote for love of country." Alluding to her battle with Parkinson' disease and cancer, Romney's wife Ann told the crowd her life was "not always a fairy tale," but introducing Romney she said "One thing I can tell you about this guy is he will always stand by my side... and he'll always do what's right for America." President Obama stopped in Concord, N.H. Sunday to garner support for his re-election bid, as the presidential campaign heads into its final two days. Two hours earlier, only eight miles away from the Romney event, Vice President Joe Biden campaigned in Lakewood, Ohio, accusing Romney and his running mate Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin of playing "a con game" in the waning days of the campaign. "They're running away from what they believe." He appealed to Democrats to get out the vote in the state that decided the 2004 election and whose 18 electoral votes might well decide the election: "We need you Ohio. We need you. We win Ohio, we win this election." In a NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist poll released Saturday, Romney was trailing Obama in Ohio 51 percent to 45 percent among likely voters, including those who were undecided yet leaning toward a candidate and those who voted early. The survey found that 3 percent were undecided. Ryan was also campaigning Sunday in Ohio with a stop in Mansfield. As his first event Sunday Ryan, dressed in a Green Bay Packers jacket, arrived at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, Wisc., to attend a tailgate party. Green Bay has ranked among the nation's top presidential campaign TV ad media markets in recent weeks. Meanwhile Obama opened his day by rallying Democrats in the small but vital battleground of New Hampshire which has only four electoral votes of the 270 needed to win the presidency. George W. Bush carried the state in 2000 but Democrat John Kerry won it in 2004 and Obama won it in 2008. "Just as we did when Bill Clinton was president, we gotta ask the wealthiest to pay a little bit more so we can reduce the deficit and still invest in the things we need to grow," Obama told a crowd in Concord, N.H. The president told the crowd that on Saturday night he had consulted with his campaign advisers. "I looked at David Plouffe, some of you know he's my big campaign poo-bah smart guy. But Plouffe and I looked at each other and we said, 'You know what. We're no longer relevant. We're props. Because what's happened is that now the campaign falls on these 25-year old kids who are out there knocking on doors, making phone calls, and then we realized, you know, pretty soon after they do their jobs then they're not relevant either because it's now up to you." And Clinton reminisced with the crowd about his second-place finish in the 1992 New Hampshire primary that kept alive his faltering campaign: "Twenty years and nine months ago, New Hampshire began the chance for me to become president." He added," It's no secret that I never tire of coming here, that I never forget anything that happened here and I'm still looking for someplace I haven't yet been. And it is a very good thing that in the closing days of this campaign you have the chance to send the president back where he belongs to four more years in the White House." Romney will hold his final rally of the campaign Monday night in Manchester, N.H., underscoring again the significance of tis four electoral votes. In his first event Sunday in Des Moines, Iowa, Romney played on the theme of a smaller federal government which doesn't over-promise. "Paul and I have not promised you a bigger check from the government," Romney told the crowd. "And we haven't promised to take from some people to redistribute to you. We've instead promised to rebuild the economy and to tame the growth of government and restore the principles that made America the greatest nation in the history of the earth." He remind his supporters how vital Iowa is to his campaign strategy: "I need Iowa – I need Iowa so we can win the White House and take back America, keep it strong, make sure we always remain the hope of the earth. I'm counting on you. Will you get the job done?" A new Des Moines Register Iowa poll released Sunday showed Romney trailing Obama 47 percent to 42 percent. Romney will head Sunday afternoon to campaign in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, just north of Philadelphia, in an eleventh-hour foray that came as a surprise to most outside observers. No Republican presidential candidate has won the state since 1988, but a recent Franklin & Marshall poll of Pennsylvania voters has Romney trailing Obama by only 4 percentage points among likely voters. A Romney victory in Pennsylvania would be one of the campaign's biggest surprises. Asked by a reporter Sunday whether it is a little too late for Romney to invest time campaigning in Pennsylvania, Romney senior advisor Kevin Madden said, "No, because this is one of those states that came into view right after the first debate. And as a result it just presented a great opportunity…. And here you are with an incumbent president under 50 (percent in polling). We're essentially tied. We're overperforming in many of these critical areas of the state, like the Philadelphia suburbs, areas like Scranton, southwest Pennsylvania. So we see it as a great opportunity and traveling there today we think can help make a difference. And this is actually the perfect time given that you're 48 hours from people making a decision, given that that they don't have early voting there." In addition to his stop in Pennsylvania, Romney was slated to campaign Sunday in Virginia and Florida. NBC News's Carrie Dann, Garrett Haake and Ali Weinberg contributed to this story |
Nonvoters: Too busy, fed up or pessimistic
Courtesy photos For different reasons, Suzann Holland, of Monroe, Wis., Heather Felton, of Parrish, Fla., and Ryan King, of Buffalo, N.Y. will not be voting in the Nov. 6 elections. By Isolde Raftery, NBC News Tabitha Brown, 29, of Oregon, says she won't vote because she finds her ballot too confusing. "I'm just a simple girl," she said. "Dumb it down for us." In Buffalo, N.Y. Ryan King, 19, said he won't vote because he doesn't know if he's registered. He mailed in a registration form, but no one replied, so he doesn't know where to show up. Further south in the Bronx, Lala, a woman who is staying at a shelter, said she won't vote because she thought she needed a state ID, which she can't afford. When she learned she didn't need an ID, it was too late to register. Political pundits say undecided voters will determine the election, but little is said about people like Brown, King and Lala, who aren't voting. Since the 1960s, voter turnout has steadily declined in the U.S., which already ranks near the bottom among established democracies. In 2008, 64 percent of voting-age citizens voted, compared with 93 percent in Chile, 86 percent in Germany and 74 percent in Canada. NBC News recently asked readers via Twitter, Facebook and through NBCNews.com to tell us why they won't cast their ballots. Their responses paralleled those from a 2008 survey by the U.S. Census Bureau: They don't like their choices, they're busy or they're not interested. Broken down, the least likely voters have the lowest level of education. In fact, the most pronounced voting gap in 2008 was not between young and senior (49 to 72 percent) but between those without a high school degree and those with advanced degrees – 39 percent to 83 percent. The wealthier are more likely voters -- 52 percent of those whose annual family income is less than $20,000 voted versus 80 percent among those whose families bring in more than $100,000. That could be partly because low-income people have more trouble taking time off work to vote. "Everyone's pressed for time these days and therefore whether or not an employer is actively allowing people to vote the employees may feel time-pressed or constrained to take that legally protected time," said Susan Schoenfeld, senior legal editor for Business & Legal Resources, which provides guidance to employers on human resources issues. Although some states require that employers give workers time off to vote, human resource experts say those laws are sometimes too confusing for employers and employees to understand. About 13 percent of those responding to the Census survey said they didn't vote because they didn't like the 2008 candidates. That theme emerged among our readers too – many of them women in their 30s and 40s – who said not voting was itself political. "It feels like a third choice," said Suzann Holland, a 41-year-old public library director from Monroe, Wis. "We tend to think we have two choices because third parties are not viable, but there is a third choice – to let other people decide because sometimes either choice goes against everything we believe in." Holland has voted in the past but this year, she said the debates between President Barack Obama and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney "cemented my distaste for both candidates." Breeanne Findley, 32, of Moline, Ill., is also fed up with Obama and Romney. She and her husband have five children between the two of them; she is a stay-at-home mom and is devoutly Pentecostal. "I kept going back and forth, I looked online at who else was running for president – the Green Party and some other independent groups – but I didn't like those guys either," Findley said. Her sister-in-law was appalled, she said. "She says that I'm not allowing my voice to be heard, saying that I should reconsider because my vote matters, there these are things I need to be voting for." She has decided it doesn't matter who becomes president: "I'm a Christian and I believe that God is in charge. If this guy wins, it's not the end of the world because God is still God." In Florida, Heather Felton, 37, said she found herself lost in the political middle. She is Catholic, opposed to abortion, but also opposed to the death penalty and in favor of gun control. She has nuanced views about immigration. "I posted to my Facebook page, 'Who should I vote for? Give me a good moral reason," she said. "But people aren't giving me a good moral reason. They're presenting negative inflammatory language." Back in New York, Ryan King, a student at Cansius College, is not alone in struggling with registering to vote. Six percent of nonvoters between the ages of 18 and 24 didn't vote in 2008 because they didn't know how or where to sign up, according to the Census data. After mailing in a voter registration form, he looked online for clues about where he should vote. He asked the College Democrats and the College Republicans at his school, but they told him they didn't know. Increasingly jaded, King now questions whether his vote would count. (Which lands him in another Census category: Four percent of nonvoters said they didn't register because they didn't believe their vote would make a difference.) "I just feel so disenfranchised voting in New York," he said. "It doesn't matter anyway. If I voted for Obama, it wouldn't count, so why bother?" He added: "If you want me to vote so bad, at least meet me halfway," he said. In the Bronx, Lala was slightly sheepish to find out she didn't need an ID to vote. (She used to live in Georgia, where ID is required.) But mostly, she said, she feels increasingly apathetic. More pressing was food for dinner and ultimately, a job. She checked her wallet – she had $30 to her name. She said she read Romney's five-point plan but found it lacking and disjointed. "As much as I would love to be bitter about living in poverty during the Obama administration, I have to consider that the alternative is a man without a plan," Lala said. Then she grew contemplative. "All I need is something as simple as a job," she said. "I could have my quality of life back. I don't know how voting is going to meet my immediate needs." NBC's Allison Linn contributed reporting to this story.
|
Delphi retirees say the government betrayed them
By Talesha Reynolds and Lisa Myers, NBC News At first glance, David Kane, 63, appears to be solidly middle class. He has a home on a lovely suburban street in Sandusky, Ohio, and a boat docked in the nearby marina. But looks can be deceiving. Kane doesn't have television or even a functioning wristwatch. He and his wife Dianne live on their boat, a 1976 Trojan Tri-Cabin in need of repair, for part of the year to save on utility costs. He does outdoor maintenance at the marina to pay for the docking fees. After a 35-year career at Delphi, the primary parts supplier for General Motors, Kane expected retirement to look much different. He left the company at age 54 as it was downsizing, and he was offered a buyout. But in 2009, Kane received word that, as part of the bailout to save General Motors, the pensions that he and 20,000 fellow Delphi salaried employees were promised would be reduced 30 to 70 percent. Kane lost almost half his pension and now receives only $1,600 a month. He says it has been devastating. "It's just a beat down, day in and day out, to struggle to get through." What makes it more difficult is that other Delphi workers who worked alongside Kane, members of the powerful United Auto Workers union, did not suffer the same fate. They are receiving their full pensions. When the government stepped in to bail out GM, providing a total of $50 billion from taxpayers, it also had to deal with Delphi, which already was in bankruptcy, because GM needed Delphi's parts to build its cars. In the process, Delphi's pensions were handed over to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBCG), a government-backed entity that insures private pensions. The PBCG terminated the pension plans, which were underfunded at the time. Then General Motors did something that the Government Accountability Office, Congress' investigative arm, later called "unusual." GM agreed to top up the pensions of 22,000 Delphi members of the United Auto Workers union – at a cost of $1 billion. That enabled the UAW workers to still get their full pensions. But there was no such sweetener for the company's salaried employees or for the non-UAW hourly workers. And because the PBGC has statutory limits on how much it can pay in benefits, their payments were reduced sharply. "We were the group that was just kicked to the curb like yesterday's trash," said Bruce Gump, vice-chairman of the Delphi Salaried Employees Association. Now, two congressional committees and the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Recovery Program (SIGTARP) are investigating the basis and motivation for this decision. Was this a political favor for a powerful union that backed President Barack Obama, as critics claim? Or was this a business decision by GM, based, according to the company, on an agreement originally negotiated in 1999 during Delphi's spin off from the automaker? What role did the Obama administration play? Inspector General Christy Romero, has said she's looking into "whether the (administration's) auto task force pressured GM to provide additional funding for those pensions." In a later agreement with the new GM, two other unions, IUE and USWA, were also topped up. Members of the Delphi Salaried Employees Association say they do not begrudge the union retirees their pensions, because they earned them. The salaried workers just want equal treatment, and they want answers from the government. Retirees hard hit by 'broken promises' "It's a struggle every day, and every time anything breaks, it's a near disaster," she said, adding that she hasn't had a working dishwasher for two years. Miller had been counting on her full pension to help her start new career as a life coach. "My plan was, 'OK, I have a pension and I have health care. And I have a son in high school and sons in college -- and a daughter also. But if we live very simply, I can make that pension stretch so that I can really have my dream." Miller started the business anyway, but she says it is growing slowly because of the economy. Miller has a friend, a former colleague at Delphi with whom she worked closely for several years in the same role, though he was paid hourly while she was drawing a salary. She can't understand why he was treated differently. "What made the work that that person did more valuable than the work I did? What was greater about the promise he received when he went to work for GM and Delphi than what I was told?" Gump, who worked for General Motors and Delphi for almost 33 years and was a senior engineer when he retired, lost about 30 percent of his pension. "Inside our organization we have lots of people that have seen their homes foreclosed," he said. "They've had to declare personal bankruptcy. There's been some families that have broken up over the stress associated with this. There's even been a couple suicides." The DSRA retirees are a politically diverse group – Republicans, Democrats and Independents – but regardless of political stripe, many of them believe the Obama administration betrayed them. Howard Collins, a Democrat, said he voted for Barack Obama in 2008 but isn't sure he would do so again. "I don't know if I will decide until I actually go in the voting booth," he said. Did the government pick winners and losers? "What I think is a fair surmise is that General Motors made a judgment that there was a commercial necessity for treating the UAW the way they did," says Bloom. There was concern that the unions might interfere with the flow of parts from Delphi to the auto company, which could harm new GM. Topping up the union pensions ensured the work would continue. "The UAW had commercial leverage in this case, which they utilized." Bloom now says he feels for the Delphi workers. "There's no making it nice. There's no saying it's OK. The only thing one can say is that it was done in a responsible and fair way relative to the rules of the road in a bankruptcy." His position was echoed by Treasury Spokesman Anthony Coley, who told NBC News, "As has been exhaustively documented, Treasury's consistent approach to the auto restructuring was to defer to GM's business judgment and not approve or disapprove individual business decisions. While the GM restructuring involved painful concessions from all stakeholders, President Obama's decision to stand behind GM and the American auto industry saved more than a million jobs." But Bruce Gump, the Delphi salaried workers representative, calls that justification a "smoke screen." "I believe that what really happened was that this administration simply wanted to take care of their political base," he said. The administration has turned over thousands of documents related to Treasury's discussions between GM, Delphi and the PBGC, but not to the satisfaction of members of the House Oversight Committee, House Ways and Means Committee, or attorneys for the salaried Delphi employees They accuse the Treasury Department of stonewalling and withholding key documents. Ron Bloom and key Task Force members Harry Wilson and Matthew Feldman refused to be interviewed by the special investigator general of TARP about the Delphi pension decisions for almost a year, until July, when they were called to testify before a house subcommittee. Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, called their refusal to answer questions "a happy train of silence." The three have now complied and the special investigator general's audit is nearing completion. Emails and testimony from lawsuits and ongoing investigations suggest the administration was deeply involved in GM's decisions and considered a list of "politically sensitive" issues, but so far there is no proof the pension decisions were driven by political favoritism. For its part, General Motors maintains that by topping up the union pensions, the company was fulfilling an agreement made at the time of the Delphi spin-off. And GM holds that the fate of the salaried employees was in the hands of the new Delphi. "Delphi's salaried pension plan was fully funded, and it was transferred to Delphi at the time the new company was created," GM spokesperson Greg Martin said in a statement to NBC News. "Responsibility for the future health of that plan – including funding levels and asset allocation – rested solely with Delphi. The new GM is not in a position to fund salaried Delphi pensions twice." In 2010, then UAW President Ron Gettelfinger expressed support for Delphi's salaried pensioners. "This is a grave injustice," Gettelfinger wrote in a letter to the Delphi Salaried Retirees Association. "While the restructuring of America's auto industry requires shared sacrifice and responsibility, Delphi's salaried retirees/former employees are being forced to bear extra burdens that are not warranted." Seeking resolution Last week Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, sent a letter to Department of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the White House Counsel requesting compliance with a congressional request for documents. Sen. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, has introduced legislation that would restore the salaried pensions using proceeds from the sale of the government's shares of GM stock. But legislation takes time. The group representing the salaried workers would prefer to receive their full pension directly from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which they say would not cost taxpayers a dime, because it receives its income from the premiums paid by the companies whose plans it insures. Whether or not they believe the decision was made to appease an influential ally of the administration, the salaried retirees say that after a three-year struggle, it is just time to put things right. "Really, that's in the past to be honest with you," said David Kane. "You can't do anything about history. It's locked in. Where do we go from here? I'm more focused on what we do now to change the future. That's the only thing we can change." Kane's wife, Dianne, lost her job around the same time his pension was reduced. Together, the couple has nine part-time jobs, but they are still barely making it. "Our finances were based upon this scale, if you will, of expected income. And even with all the number jobs that we're working, it doesn't replace what we lost. It was easier sliding down the hill than to climb back up it," Kane said. Kane's health has created additional challenges. Months before his pension was cut, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer. He also suffers from chronic fatigue syndrome. Kane is still looking for full-time work but has had no luck. He suspects his age and poor health are a factor. Nevertheless, he remains hopeful. "What I would like to see now is that portion of our pensions restored to the levels that they were before Delphi exited bankruptcy and did away with our pensions," he said. "If I can get that portion back, I can make it. It's just too tough without it." Lisa Myers is NBC's senior investigative correspondent and Talesha Reynolds is an NBC investigative producer. |
If states legalize pot, will feds still crack down?
Three states will decide on Tuesday whether to take the unprecedented step of legalizing marijuana. NBC's Pete Williams reports. By Bill Briggs, NBC News contributor Marijuana-legalization backers believe they're well schooled on all things leafy – from cannabis to political tea leaves. With pro-pot measures leading in recent polls in Washington and Colorado, proponents don't foresee federal agents interceding in those states if voters approve the initiatives. Their rationale: Two years ago, when California voters considered a similar proposal to legalize the adult possession of an ounce or less of pot, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder publicly vowed the feds would continue to prosecute anyone in that state caught possessing marijuana — even if the law passed. It failed. This year, in contrast, federal anti-drug authorities have repeatedly declined to discuss decriminalization proposals in three states — including a measure in Oregon that would end the prohibition of marijuana there. (That initiative trailed in recent polls.) The response routinely delivered by U.S. Department of Justice spokeswoman Allison Price, including in an e-mail to NBC News: "We are not going to speculate on the outcome of the various ballot initiatives in each of the states." "That, to me, is significant because they didn't just copy and paste what they did and said in 2010. We feel pretty good about that," said Alison Holcomb, campaign director for Washington's Initiative 502, which seeks to regulate and tax marijuana production and distribution in that state. According to a poll released Thursday, Initiative 502 had the support of 55 percent of Washington voters. But Dr. Kevin A. Sabet, former senior drug policy advisor to the Obama Administration and director of the Drug Policy Institute at the University of Florida, predicts a far different law-enforcement reality on the ground in Washington — as well as in Colorado, where Amendment 64 would allow the state to regulate marijuana as it does alcohol. "Once these states actually try to implement these laws, we will see an effort by the feds to shut it down," Sabet said. Sabet's vision of post-election pot realities in Washington and Colorado — where Amendment 64 has majority support, according to a recent poll — seems to suggest a possible weed war between the feds and the states. "We can only guess now what exactly that would look like," Sabet said. "But the recent U.S. Attorney actions against medical marijuana portends an aggressive effort to stop state-sponsored growing and selling at the outset." (That includes, he said, letters sent by federal prosecutors last January to medical marijuana dispensaries in Colorado operating within 1,000 feet of schools, ordering those businesses to halt sales.) "The question voters should be asking themselves," Sabet said, "before voting on these initiatives is this: Is your right to buy pot from a store down the street worth the risk of increased teenage drug abuse, increased enforcement action by the feds, and increased problems like 'stoned driving?' " Whether a legal showdown is ignited or not, some state-legalization proponents see their measures as possible footholds in a march toward national marijuana decriminalization. "Exactly 80 year ago, Colorado voters approved a ballot measure to appeal alcohol prohibition, and that came prior to it being repealed by the federal government," said Mason Tvert, co-director of the Yes on 64 campaign in Colorado, a state that already regulates the sale of medical marijuana. "And it was the individual states taking that type of action that ultimately resulted in the federal (Prohibition) repeal. "The same kind of thing is underway with marijuana," he added. "Whether there's going to be a critical mass, who knows?" In Washington, Holcomb echoed that uncertainty: "I'm not sure how that's going to play out." "It may be there's going to some generational evolution on this. Medical marijuana was introduced in the mid-90s and we were still talking to a lot of people that were coming out of the 'Reefer Madness' era, who had a lot of fear. And (medical marijuana) was a really powerful way to help them see that marijuana is not this terribly scary thing that they had been told," Holcomb said. Indeed, the most recent poll on Colorado's Amendment 64 found that 73 percent of state state's residents who are under age 30 want pot legalized. At the same time, more than half of seniors are against decriminalizing marijuana. Anti-drug watchdog Sabet, meanwhile, sides with most current political leaders — "the overwhelming majority of Congress (and) both major presidential candidates" — as well as the American Medical Association standing against the decriminalizing of marijuana: "I don't envision national legalization as a realistic possibility in the near future." "The state-level efforts could soon prove to be a tipping point for more aggressive legalization initiatives," Sabet said. "However, there is a growing consensus within the medical and treatment community — who deal with the problems of marijuana use and addiction everyday — to reject both extreme prohibition and lax legalization. I think we'll end up with a policy that is more centrist, for example, not punishing people by barring them from a job for a past marijuana arrest, but also not allowing marijuana to be marketed and sold like alcohol or cigarettes." Do you support the legalization of marijuana? More content from NBCNews.com:
|
Boy falls into zoo exhibit, mauled to death by dogs
Gene J. Puskar / AP file An African painted dog yawns at the Pittsburgh Zoo in March 2009. Officials say a young boy was mauled to death after falling into the wild dog exhibit on Sunday. A young boy fell into an African painted dog exhibit at a Pittsburgh zoo and was mauled to death by the wild animals, zoo officials said. The child, about 3 years old, was with his mother visiting the Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium when he somehow fell from a 14-foot-high observation deck into the exhibit at about 11:45 a.m. He was immediately attacked by several dogs and died, zoo President and CEO Barbara Baker said. The zoo quickly moved visitors into buildings as animal keepers tried to coax the dogs into an off-exhibit area. Many of the 11 dogs in the exhibit moved away immediately, and several others were scared away from the child by the zookeepers. A remaining dog would not leave the child, and a Pittsburgh police officer shot the animal. NBC News Officials gather near the scene of a fatal child mauling at the Pittsburgh Zoo on Sunday. Baker pointed out these types of dogs typically hunt in packs, so this behavior is not considered unusual. No visitors on the observation deck saw the child fall into the exhibit, Baker said. The zoo was closed for the day while police and zoo officials investigate. African painted dogs, also known as African wild dogs, Cape hunting dogs, spotted dogs, and painted wolves, are found in the open plains and sparse woodlands of sub-Saharan Africa. The long-legged canines have only four toes per foot. According to the zoo's website, African painted dogs are the size of medium domestic dogs, weighing on average between 37 and 80 pounds and measuring 24 to 30 inches high. The dogs are classified as an endangered species. Last spring, nine of the 11 painted dogs escaped a section of their enclosure, causing a brief shutdown of the zoo. The dogs were coaxed back into their exhibit area with food. No one was hurt. NBC's Betsy Cline contributed to this story. More content from NBCNews.com:
|