10/11/2012

Paying $2 million to get your kid into Harvard?

A Hong Kong couple's claims that a former Harvard professor bilked them of $2 million on promises he would get their sons into Harvard is a cautionary tale for parents entangled in the highly competitive college-admissions roulette, experts say.

  1. Only on NBCNews.com

    1. 'Pinktober' ignores late-stage breast cancer
    2. NYC denizen shows how to live in tiny apartment
    3. Updated 111 minutes ago 10/11/2012 12:51:50 PM +00:00 Environmental nonprofit's donation tough to figure
    4. NBC/WSJ/Marist poll: Romney gains in key swing states
    5. Updated 32 minutes ago 10/11/2012 2:10:29 PM +00:00 Baltimore fire kills 4 kids and a woman, injures 2 firefighters
    6. Suicide is epidemic for American Indian youth
    7. German cabinet approves controversial circumcision bill

"When it comes to college admissions, there are no guarantees — period," said Mark Kantrowitz, a college-financing and planning expert from Cranberry Township, Pa. "If someone tells you they can get you into Harvard, it's a scam."

Gerald and Lily Chow, both residents of China, say in their lawsuit filed in 2010 in U.S. District Court in Boston that they paid Mark Zimny $2 million on promises he would get the Chows' two sons into an elite American university, preferably Harvard. The Chows also claim Zimny said he would help funnel donations from the Chows to other elite colleges to circumvent alleged racism against Asian donors, according to the lawsuit.

The Chows accuse Zimny of fraud, breach of contract and unjust enrichment — and they want their millions back. Zimny has denied the allegations in court papers, The Boston Globe reported.

The lawsuit is making its way through federal court and may be scheduled for a November hearing, according to the Globe.

"The most talented of students apply to Harvard — and the most talented of students don't get in," Kantrowitz said. "This case is mind-boggling."

'Killer for our industry'
While the Chow case is extreme, Kantrowitz said, parents nationwide are shelling out big bucks to try to get their child into top-ranked institutions, hiring consultants to help them prepare for exams and essays needed for college applications.

"I am outraged on behalf of the industry, and it is a killer for our industry," said Michele A. Hernández, president of Hernandez College Consulting in Weybridge, Vt.

Hernández is a former Dartmouth admissions officer. National Public Radio profiled her in 2008, describing how she charges $40,000 to help students get into Ivy League schools, and $14,000 for a four-day boot camp on preparing essays for college applications. Critics have accused of her writing essays herself on behalf of students, a claim she denies.

"I don't get students in, students get themselves in," she said.

Since the industry has no regulations, Hernández said, parents should scrutinize credentials of a consultant. She said people who are consultants should have worked in a college admissions office and not just for the institution.

"In this business, ethics are so hard to come by — and people need to stop obsessing over Harvard," she said.

Last year, Harvard accepted only 6.2 percent of the 34,950 applicants to the Class of 2015, according to The Harvard Crimson, the university's student publication. Harvard's admissions rate was the lowest in the Ivy League, below Columbia's 6.9 percent rate and Yale's 7.35, the Crimson reported.

Harvard's senior communications officer, Jeff Neal, told NBC News the college is skeptical of admissions consulting agencies.

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

"While it is certainly possible that in individual cases an admissions consultant can be helpful to an applicant, we have encountered no evidence to indicate that is the case generally," Neal told NBC News in an email. "More importantly, our process — and the very wide range of information we collect about applicants — is designed to give us the broadest possible view of their qualifications, regardless of whether they used a consultant or not."

    1. Paying $2 million to get your kid into Harvard?

      Updated 9 minutes ago 10/11/2012 2:34:03 PM +00:00 A Hong Kong couple's claims that a former professor bilked them of $2 million on promises he would get their sons into Harvard is a cautionary tale for parents, experts say. Full story

    2. How NJ schools are using Zuckerberg's millions
    3. Report card on 2 Zuckerberg-funded schools
    4. Prepping kids for school: Solution in poorest state?
    5. Q&A: How to improve school readiness in Miss.?

'You can buy your way in'
According to the lawsuit, Zimny is a founder of the education consultancy group IvyAdmit Consulting LLC. Zimny's agency is described as a Connecticut limited liability company with an office in Cambridge, Mass., according to the lawsuit.

In an online search of the firm's website, Zimny's name was no longer included in the staff list, and attempts by NBC News to reach officials at IvyAdmit Consulting were unsuccessful Tuesday.

The Globe characterized Zimny's target group as Chinese MBA applicants and children of wealthy Asian families.

"A lot of them don't understand how the American college system works," Elizabeth Stone, a consultant who has been approached by many Chinese hopefuls, told the Globe. "I think the mentality is, 'you can buy your way in.' "

The Chows have refused interviews, and their Boston-based lawyers, Marjorie Sommer Cooke and Kevin W. Clancy, also were unavailable for comment Tuesday.

Watch the Top Videos on NBCNews.com

The Chows said in the lawsuit that Zimny introduced himself to the couple in 2007 during their eldest son's ninth-grade graduation from Eaglebrook School, a private boarding school in Deerfield, Mass.

According to the lawsuit, Zimny's credentials checked out: He was a lecturer and visiting assistant professor at Harvard and the Graduate School of Education between 2001 and 2005. But he was no longer affiliated with the college after 2005.

The Chows said they believed Zimny would get the Chow boys into the prestigious school.

The Chows wired Zimny at least $8,000 a month for their sons in 2007 under an agreement with Zimny, court documents showed.

"In the summer of 2008, Zimny recommended to Mr. and Mrs. Chow that rather than paying him $4,000 a month for each child for his consulting services, they instead deposit with IvyAdmit a $1,000,000 retainer for First Son and a $1,000,000 retainer for Second Son," according to the lawsuit. "Zimny represented that this $2 million retainer would be part of a big pool of money contributed by similar Asian, mostly Korean, families. He stated that the purpose of this pool of money was to help their sons and daughters gain admission to colleges of their choice in the United States."

The Chows wired Zimny the $2 million over a period of several months in late 2008 and early 2009, the lawsuit states.

In exchange, several of Zimny's employees also helped tutor not only the Chow boys, but also their father, a jewelry magnate.

After some time, the Chows grew increasingly suspicious and asked about the use of their money, and the Chows severed relations in the fall of 2009.

The Chow sons didn't get into Harvard, but have since enrolled in Ivy League institutions, which have not been disclosed, according to the Globe.

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

© 2012 NBCNews.com  Reprints

Baltimore fire kills 4 kids and a woman, injures 2 firefighters

Credit: Patrick Semansky

Officials stand in front of a fire-damaged house in Baltimore, where an early morning fire claimed the lives of an adult and four children on Oct. 11, 2012.

By NBC News staff and wire services

An intense fire that ripped through a row house in northeast Baltimore early Thursday killed an adult and four children, a fire official said.

Fire department spokesman Chief Kevin Cartwright says firefighters were called around 2 a.m. and arrived to find heavy fire and smoke coming from the first and second floors of the home.

Cartwright said there were "intense flames coming out of every window and door in this structure."

Baltimore City Fire Chief James Clack told NBC affiliate WBALTV that 10 people were in home, and five escaped before the fire crews arrived.


One man jumped from a second-floor window to escape the blaze, he said. The man was taken to Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center for treatment, where he was in stable condition. Others, including a woman who handed a baby out of the home, escaped before firefighters arrived at the scene. Cartwright said he believes the baby is in good condition.

Firefighters found the bodies of five people during a search and rescue operation. The victims are believed to be a grandmother and her four grandchildren, Cartwright said. Their identities were not immediately released, but family members told NBC affiliate WBALTV at the scene that the children were 1, 3, 5 and 7. The woman who died was 55, they said.

Credit: Patrick Semansky

Barbara Hopkins, left, hugs her grandson, whose nickname was only given as Mick, outside of Hopkins' son's house in Baltimore on Oct. 11, 2012, after an early morning fire claimed the lives of an adult and four children.

Two firefighters were injured while battling the blaze when one fell through the second floor of the home into the basement. Both were taken to Bayview and were in stable condition.

The fire was brought under control around 3:45 a.m. Hours later, officials were still at the scene investigating while about 20 neighbors watched from a roped off area. The exterior of the two-story brick home was blackened by the fire, and wood beams in the roof were visible.

Fire investigators and police arson detectives told WBALTV were investigating what caused the blaze, but said they believed the fire may have started in the basement. 

Barbara Hopkins, who was standing outside the building, said her son had been in the fire and was being treated for third-degree burns at Bayview. She told WBALTV her son was the man who had jumped out the window and did so head first.

"He's severely burned," she said. "This is awful."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Five things to watch for in VP debate

Vice President Joe Biden and Republican challenger Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin, face off Thursday in their only debate.
Vice President Joe Biden and Republican challenger Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin, face off Thursday in their only debate.
  • Will Biden use the issues Obama avoided last week to take the fight to Ryan?
  • Can "numbers guy" Ryan avoid the fiscal wonkery quicksand that sank Obama last week?
  • Will Biden argue or avoid his ticket's differences with the Republicans on Social Security?
  • Almost three decades apart, will the age gap between Ryan and Biden be a factor?

Danville, Kentucky (CNN) -- Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. Paul Ryan, GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney's running mate, will share the stage in Danville, Kentucky, in their only debate. Biden and Ryan's debate follows the top of the tickets' first of three debates last week, in which Obama turned in a lackluster performance, upstaged by an aggressive and vibrant Romney.

Here are five things to watch for on Thursday night:

1. Will Biden go where Obama didn't?

Biden is not shy on the campaign trail; the day after last week's first presidential debate, the vice president attacked Republican nominee Mitt Romney in a way that many Democrats had wished President Barack Obama would have done the night before.

King: VP debate no game-changer, but could shift momentum

How aggressive will Biden be in going after the man at the top of the GOP ticket rather than the man he'll share the debate stage with? Will Biden highlight the "47%" controversy, Bain Capital and Romney's tax returns?

"The vice president likes laying out the contrast between the Romney-Ryan extreme agenda and the plans he and the president have to move this country forward and we fully expect that to continue Thursday night," an Obama campaign official told CNN.

With the polls tightening both nationally and in key battleground states after last week's debate, the stakes for the showdown between the running mates have increased.

What to expect in the Biden-Ryan debate
Advice from Palin? Ryan Says "Sure"
Pressure on Biden and Ryan in debate

"Biden needs to play offense, not defense," said Democratic strategist and CNN contributor Paul Begala, who is a senior adviser for a pro-Obama super PAC. "Attack the Romney-Ryan plan to cut taxes for the rich and raise them on the middle class. Dissect the Romney-Ryan plan to end Medicare as we know it. Point out that if Romney had been president, Osama bin Laden would be alive and GM would be dead. And be prepared to body-slam Ryan when -- not if -- he fibs."

2. The wonk trap

Paul Ryan likes to call himself "a numbers guy."

Indeed, wonky budget talk is Ryan's calling card. It's the primary reason he has captured the hearts of conservative elites in Washington, who see him as the second coming of Jack Kemp.

Ryan's debate prep as meticulous as he is

But fiscal wonkery was quicksand for Obama during last week's debate. His dreary reliance on budget math over pointed political arguments contrasted sharply with Mitt Romney, who presented his ideas with vigor and clarity, despite obvious questions about the factual underpinnings of his ideas.

Can Ryan avoid getting bogged down in the arithmetic that so thrills him? An adviser to the GOP vice presidential nominee told The National Review's Robert Costa this week that Ryan "may be over-preparing" for his showdown with Biden.

By some accounts, Ryan has bristled at platitude-driven demands of the campaign trail. He'd rather be talking substance, on the road with a PowerPoint presentation about Medicare costs.

The challenge for Ryan on Thursday, though, is to present the Romney vision to millions of voters without sounding too much like the Beltway think tank staffer he once was.

He's done a solid job of that since Romney put him on the GOP ticket in August. Now, on the biggest stage of his career, he has to abandon some of the Capitol Hill tendencies that made him a star in the first place.

Paul Ryan hasn't called Palin for advice

3. Will Biden put Social Security in play?

In the House, Paul Ryan has backed moving Social Security funds to private investment accounts as a way to make the popular entitlement program more solvent.

Ryan's past proposals would seem to tee up what's usually a winning political argument for Democrats: that the Republican ticket wants to gut Social Security to help their old pals on Wall Street.

But to the bewilderment of Democratic strategists, Obama appeared to take the issue off the table in the first debate.

"I suspect that on Social Security, we've got a somewhat similar position," Obama said. "Social Security is structurally sound. It's going to have to be tweaked the way it was by Ronald Reagan and Democratic Speaker Tip O'Neill. But it is, the basic structure is sound."

CNN Money: Social Security, Where Obama and Romney stand

The Obama campaign scrambled to clarify last week that yes, in fact, the two candidates have fundamentally different views on Social Security.

"The choice is clear: President Obama will never privatize Social Security or undermine retirement security for middle-class Americans," read a post on the Obama campaign website that went up after the debate. "The same cannot be said for Romney."

Will Biden try to score fresh points by raising the issue of Social Security privatization against Ryan? Or did the president already holster one of his party's most effective political attacks?

4. The age gap

"I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience."

So went Ronald Reagan's famous line in one of his 1984 debates against Democratic challenger Walter Mondale.

Will Biden have a similar quip ready on Thursday?

OK, Biden is not nearly as old as Reagan, who was 73 at the time of his re-election. But at 69, he has almost three decades on Ryan, his 42-year-old debate opponent.

How Ryan sharpens debate skills

Biden is also known for his exuberance and devilish charm, so perhaps the age gap won't be as apparent as it was in 2008, when 47-year-old Barack Obama shared a stage with 72-year-old John McCain. Or as it was in 1988, when 67-year-old Lloyd Bentsen debated his boyish vice presidential foe Dan Quayle.

Stylistically, their birthdays might not matter much. But the age difference neatly crystallizes the arguments being presented by both campaigns.

Will voters choose experience and decide to move forward on the path we're on? Or will they look to a pair of fresh-faced outsiders who offer a new direction?

5. Can Ryan be seen as commander in chief?

Just as Mitt Romney needed to prove last week that he's acceptable to Americans to serve as president, Ryan needs to convey that he's ready to fill in as president in case something happens to Romney. It's one of the top tasks for the challenger's running mate in a vice presidential debate.

We'll be keeping a close watch on Ryan to see if he touts his ability to step in, if needed, to the leading role.

The Romney campaign is confident that the congressman from Wisconsin will pass the test, thanks to Ryan's position as House budget chairman and his mastery of complex fiscal issues.

"It will come down to his competency on the issues, his command of the issues," a Romney campaign official told CNN.

But Republican strategist and CNN contributor Alex Castellanos thinks that this time around, passing the competency test is not as important.

"There is very little pressure for either of these vice presidential candidates to prove they are ready to step into the office of president. Both their bosses are relatively young and in great health," Castellanos said.

Opinion: Biden must deliver for Team Obama

3 dead, worker rescued in parking garage collapse

View more videos at: http://nbcmiami.com.

By NBCMiami.com and NBC News staff

Rescue workers who pulled a badly injured worker from the wreckage of a collapsed college parking garage in Florida early Thursday were continuing to search for the last person believed to have been in the structure when it collapsed.

Miami fire and rescue crews rescued the construction worker around 1 a.m. Thursday at the Miami-Dade College in Doral, Fla.,Miami fire officials said. But in order to get the man out, medics had to amputate both of his legs above the knees, authorities said. Another trapped worker who had been freed was in critical condition.

Alan Diaz / AP

Firefighters remove a victim from the rubble early morning Oct. 11 in Doral, Fla, after a section of a parking garage under construction at Miami-Dade College campus collapsed.

Eight people were hospitalized at Miami-area hospitals after the Wednesday collapse, which killed three workers, according to a statement from Miami-Dade Fire Rescue.


Hundreds of rescuers rushed to the scene Wednesday afternoon when a portion of the five-story parking garage at 38oo N.W. 115 Ave. collapsed in what authorities call a "pancake-style collapse." Police said it appeared that only construction workers were on site.

Read the original report  |  More from NBCMiami.com

The garage was under construction and had yet to open, so no students were in danger, said college spokesman Juan Mendieta.

The debris was about 20 feet high and a crane and heavy truck were inside the work area when the garage collapsed. Street around the garage were completely blocked off.

Aerial footage showed firefighters escorting a man, who appeared to be a construction worker, out of the garage, while rescuers apparently searched through the debris.

J Pat Carter / AP

Firefighter look over the rubble after a section of a parking garage under construction at Miami-Dade College in Doral, Fla., collapsed on Oct. 10, 2012.

Victoria Buczynski of Miami said she saw the collapse while she was working at Gurkha Cigars directly across the street from the construction site.

"It fell to the ground like a house of cards," Buczynski said. "The construction workers started running out, screaming. It was loud. Our entire building shook."

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

The construction of the 1,855-space garage was nearly complete. Ground was broken on the $22.5 million project in February, and it was to be finished in December, according to the website of the contractor, Ajax Building Corp.

William P. Byrne, Ajax president  and chief executive officer, said in a statement said an internal review was being launched to determine the cause.

"While we do not yet know the cause of this tragic collapse, we are committed to working actively and cooperatively with our design and construction partners and local, state and federal authorities to determine the exact cause of this accident," the statement said.

The statement also said safety was a priority for the company.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Environmental nonprofit's donation tough to figure

By Michael Beckel
Center for Public Integrity

"Environmentalists punish companies without protecting people" is the headline of a column that appeared on the website of the American Action Forum a year ago.

The group has called for increased domestic production of oil, coal and natural gas. Officials there have criticized President Barack Obama's "eagerness to speed our progression to a low-carbon economy" and argued that the administration is "regulating coal out of existence."

The American Action Forum is also connected with a nonprofit and a super PAC that have spent millions of dollars on ads backing anti-regulation Republican candidates since 2010.

So why did the Energy Foundation, a San Francisco-based organization that funds the Sierra Club, the National Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Defense Fund and Earthjustice give the conservative nonprofit a six-figure donation last year?


Records obtained by the Center for Public Integrity show that the Energy Foundation, touted as the "leading funder of projects that address climate change," awarded the American Action Forum a $125,000 grant in 2011 for "high-level outreach and communications around carbon policy."


Follow Open Channel on Twitter and Facebook.


Jenny Coyle, a spokeswoman for the Energy Foundation, says her organization is "proud to fund a wide variety of organizations whether they are viewed as progressive or conservative."

"Clean energy is not a partisan issue," Coyle continued. "We believe that all demographics and groups will see the benefits of a prosperous and healthy clean energy economy."

Officials at the American Action Forum declined to comment about the grant.

Center for Public Integrity: Donation tough to figure 

According to records filed with the Internal Revenue Service, the Energy Foundation doled out more than $97 million in grants in 2010 to projects aimed at the adoption of stronger fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, the promotion of renewable energy technologies and the retirement of existing coal-fired power plants, among others.

Against that backdrop, the American Action Forum stands out as an unlikely beneficiary.

The group is not known as an environmental advocate. One of its projects tracks coal plants in the U.S. that are likely to close down under the Obama administration's new "regulatory burdens."

American Action Forum's president is Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who headed the Congressional Budget Office under President George W. Bush, served as top adviser to 2008 GOP presidential nominee John McCain and has had stints as a visiting fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute. Its board includes former Nixon operative Fred Malek, former GOP Sen. Norm Coleman of Minnesota, former GOP Gov. Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania and former GOP Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida.

Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the consumer group Public Citizen — which has also received grants from the Energy Foundation — says the American Action Forum "is not dedicated to clean energy."

He says the group favors deregulation and ending federal subsidies for renewable energy technologies that would tilt the playing field toward "established, traditional dirty sources of energy."

Catrina Rorke, the director of energy policy at the American Action Forum, argues that federal subsidies "are not the best tool to integrate new fuels into the market."

"We don't want to preferentially support one kind of energy over another," Rorke said.

Organized under section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. tax code, American Action Forum is focused on policy research and is affiliated with the American Action Network, which engages in advocacy as a "social welfare" group organized under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The groups are also linked to a super PAC called the Congressional Leadership Fund.

All three organizations share office space and personnel, with Coleman and Malek playing leadership roles in each.

Malek founded both the American Action Network, where he is still a board member, and the American Action Forum, where he serves as chairman of the board. He also is a board member of the Congressional Leadership Fund.

Coleman, meanwhile, is a board member of the American Action Forum and is the chairman of both the American Action Network and the Congressional Leadership Fund.

Veteran GOP operative Brian Walsh — who served as the National Republican Congressional Committee's political director during the 2010 election cycle — is the president of both the American Action Network and Congressional Leadership Fund, which have run a plethora of attack ads against Democrats.

Records filed with the Federal Election Commission show that during the 2010 election cycle alone, American Action Network reported spending more than $18 million on political advertisements — more than any other "social welfare" nonprofit, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

In this fall's hotly contested race in Minnesota's 8th District, it has attacked Democrat Rick Nolan for siding with the Environmental Protection Agency against a mining company. Nolan's campaign has said the former congressman will support the mining industry "without rolling back environmental and safety regulations for workers."

Similarly, in the highly competitive race in Ohio's 16th District, the Congressional Leadership Fund has spent more than $1 million on ads blasting Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton. Among the reasons given to oppose Sutton in November? Her vote during the 111th Congress in support of the so-called "cap-and-trade" legislation, which sought to establish both a cap on carbon emissions and a requirement that large utilities in each state increase the percentage of electricity they produce from renewable sources.

Donors to the Congressional Leadership Fund include Alpha Natural Resources, one of the country's leading producers of coal, which made a $5,000 donation from its corporate treasury in April.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the Congressional Leadership Fund has also received contributions from the political action committees connected to the Nuclear Energy Institute, the Edison Electric Institute, energy conglomerate Koch Industries, oil refining giant Valero Energy and Exelon, which is the largest nuclear power plant operator in the U.S. and last year was awarded a $646 million loan guarantee by the Department of Energy for one of its solar generation subsidiaries.

Super donors Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino owner from Nevada, and Bob Perry, the millionaire home builder from Texas, have both given generously to the Congressional Leadership Fund.

Neither American Action Forum nor American Action Network is required to publicly disclose donor information.

A review of IRS filings by the Center for Responsive Politics, however, found that donors to the American Action Network include the Republican Jewish Coalition, the American Natural Gas Alliance and Crossroads GPS, the nonprofit sister organization of conservative super PAC juggernaut American Crossroads.

The Center for Public Integrity is a nonprofit independent Investigative news outlet. 

More from Open Channel:

Follow Open Channel from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Nobel Prize for literature awarded

Peace Prize winner rips fellow laureate

Leymah Gbowee (C) shared the 2011 prize with Ellen Johnson Sirleaf (R) and Yemeni activist Tawakkol Karman.
Leymah Gbowee (C) shared the 2011 prize with Ellen Johnson Sirleaf (R) and Yemeni activist Tawakkol Karman.
  • Activist Leymah Gbowee shared 2011 prize with Liberian president Ellen Johnson Sirleaf
  • Gbowee says Johnson Sirleaf has failed to to fight corruption and nepotism in Liberia
  • Johnson Sirleaf has appointed her sons to lucrative government posts
  • Gbowee says Peace Prize winners should be more focused on spreading peace

Deauville, France (CNN) -- Leymah Gbowee, the Liberian activist who last year won the Nobel Peace Prize, says she is disappointed with fellow winner Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Liberia's president, and believes laureates need to do more to spread the message of peace.

"I think there should be more required of us by the committee ... in terms of preaching the message," said Gbowee, who shared the 2011 prize with Johnson Sirleaf and Yemeni activist Tawakkol Karman.

Read more: Three women's rights activists share Nobel Peace Prize

All Nobel laureates should come together, particularly Peace Prize winners, "to really sit down and talk about the impact we're making on the world," she told CNN in an interview at the 8th Edition of the Women's Forum Global Meeting in France.

Gbowee is a member of the Nobel Women's Initiative, established in 2006 by among others the late Wangari Maathai, which supports women's rights globally.

Offering hope to Liberian women
Past Nobel Peace Prize winners
Nobel winners discuss women's rights

Over the years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee's Peace Prize awards have come under scrutiny. Critics have questioned their choices and politics.

Read more: African women look within for change

Many saw the award given to U.S. President Barack Obama in 2009, during the first year of his presidency, as premature. Many also question the fact that Indian leader Gandhi never received the prize, despite a number of nominations.

This year's winner will be announced Friday.

Gbowee is credited with helping to end Liberia's civil war in 2003 by leading women in non-violent protest, including organizing "sex strikes."

This week, the outspoken and charismatic campaigner publicly criticized fellow laureate Johnson Sirleaf for failing to fight corruption and nepotism in Liberia.

"Let down by her, I won't say 100%, but on certain issues, yes," Gbowee said.

Gbowee, who helped Johnson Sirleaf get reelected to a second term last year, asked why the Liberian president's three sons all have lucrative government posts.

She called for Johnson Sirleaf, who became Africa's first elected female head of state in 2005, to make one of her sons step down from his job as chairman of the state-owned National Oil Company (NOCAL).

"The public (in Liberia) has spoken, these are the people who voted for (Johnson Sirleaf)," she said of the outcry in Liberia over the appointment.

Read more: Making it as a female movie mogul in Hollywood

Gbowee also resigned as head of the country's reconciliation commission after less than a year because of her concerns.

Gbowee acknowledges that Johnson Sirleaf has made progress during her time in office, particularly in building infrastructure and reducing debt in the war-scarred nation.

Liberia is one of the world's poorest and least developed countries. Fourteen years of conflict from 1989 to 2003 left an estimated 250,000 dead.

But Gbowee says if Johnson Sirleaf does not "put her foot down (on corruption) ... it's really going to hurt not just her but future women's leadership in Liberia."

Gbowee describes winning the Nobel Peace Prize as a great platform for raising awareness of her work on peace and education.

Gbowee is the head of the Ghana-based Women Peace and Security Network (WPSN) and has recently launched a foundation that funds Liberian girls through college. So far, she says, the foundation has helped 30 girls.

She says she was under no illusions when she won the prize that it would translate into extra funding for her projects.

"Being a woman, and being African -- those are two things that ... make raising funds very difficult for peace work," she said.

Read more: Words of wisdom from women of power

While she has yet to come to terms with the celebrity that accompanies winning the prize, Gbowee says the essence of what she does is still working in the community.

"What I do is not to be all red carpet and glam and cams ... when it becomes necessary to come on the red carpet, I should have a message from down there to bring to the red carpet."

Her skills and profile beg the question of whether she has ambitions in the political arena.

Gbowee wouldn't rule out running for political office in Liberia but said that she's still young.

"I'm just 40. How can I translate this gift of a Nobel into a better life for girls on the continent of Africa in general and Liberia in particular? That's the quest that I'm on right now."